MC Hammer wrote:Yes, and there's the philandering issue too.
No matter how you cut it, I can't believe that the story is total BS. There may be some exaggeration involved, but in a situation like this people are going to be pretty careful that they don't lie outright in a way that'll come back and bite them in the buttocks later.
Either way, I still think the story is a hoot. Quite a circus, entirely befitting the participating clowns.
Dood, they are not playing chess... they are wrestling in the mud...
1- the wifey want a divorce... So she'll fling any turd against her husband.
2- the guy is wanted politically dead by way too much people
3- enemies of my enemy are my allies...
As said, in politics, slander don't work the same, what's important is public attention span. Scandal explode... and the time you 'carefully build a libel case' 1- the damage is done 2- nobody cares anymore if it was true or false...
Hammerman wrote:If she didn't write the letter, don't you think she might stand up and say "I didn't write that"?
Au contraire... it's even better... Stated as "letter to his supporter" it sound all legit and shit. That don't even mean she sent the letter... That mean she can stay between sheep and wolves. If shit goes real she can claim the letter was written because she was upset and wanted to hurt him but was never sent, her secretary stole it, so there is no ground for libel-slander-whatever. BUT more importantly, since she effectively wrote, maybe, something, she can avoid denying anything to allow the lie to get substantiated enough to be 'tabloid proof'.
Freedom is like farts... You enjoy yours but usually can't stand other's...
--Zee litterbox gigolo